Us Lng Tolling Agreement

The royalty structure will be associated with many other provisions of a toll contract. Is the levy profit-oriented or not? Will capital expenditures be part of the royalty? Are operating costs in variable and fixed categorizations? Should all or part of the fee be paid if treatment services are never available? These are all critical issues that should be decided in the decision on the structure of the project. The royalty structure can have an impact on the accountability regime, funding and the relationship between project participants. It is essential that the provisions relating to repeal and planning conditions (including port use agreements or conditions of use), the measurement method and the allocation of LNG and other by-products to all toll operators who share common facilities (common facilities include LNG reservoirs and by-products) are consistent. , walkways, lifting arms and associated equipment). Clear, non-discriminatory allocation procedures and measurement principles to accurately determine the right of each toll booth to the removal of LNG and by-products are important not only for project participants, but also for financiers. The allocation procedures and evaluation method should apply equally to all parties to the toll and be reviewed by all parties using common or common facilities, or be appointed by experts. The lifting, measurement and allocation conditions are often incorporated into the toll agreement; However, it is not typical that these conditions are incorporated into a separate agreement signed by all the parties to the toll, which facilitates the flow of information, among other things, for the development of the supply plan for supply of gas, the annual LNG lifting program, the allocation of LNG and by-products, the standards and inspections of ships, and the determination of liability. The choice of legal provisions and dispute resolution rules should be uniform in the documentation of projects and in the various toll agreements. If there were to be a dispute within the framework of the toll agreements, it is very likely that several parties, if not all, using the same common or common facilities, will be affected.

The dispute resolution process is streamlined and more effective when all parties to the dispute are involved in the same dispute resolution process. Experts are often used as a dispute resolution option when technical or financial disputes arise. Again, these provisions cannot be available without continuity between dispute agreements if not all parties are subject to the same dispute resolution and expert provisions. Port Arthur received its Final Environmental Impact Statement (EFSI) from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in January and is expected to receive its final FERC contract later this year, its non-free-trade (non-FTA) agreement from the Ministry of Energy (DOE). HOUSTON INTERVIEW (ICIS): U.S. supplier Sempra, which is currently building The Cameron LNG export plant in Louisiana, is moving away from the initial toll model from its first installment of contract to a free onboard model (FOB) or an ex-ship-delivered (DES) model, said the new president of its LNG division, Justin Bird. This paper highlights (i) a number of findings that need to be addressed during the structuring phase of the development of the project and (ii) the need for consistency of documents in toll agreements with different parties. It is not an exclusive list of important considerations; it merely illustrates the complexity and importance of previous decision-making issues in the process of structuring and properly documenting the toll system. While lenders may require different forms of security, guaranteeing the source of revenue from the sale of LNG and by-products is essential not only for banks, but also for other project participants.

It is typical that a loyalty agreement (often offshore, for investments in developing countries)



Partagez
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •